• nivo slider image

Category: Green Info

U.S. Energy Legislation that May Be Passed Despite Gridlock

You might imagine that no significant energy legislation will pass through the current U.S. congressional climate, but the Alliance to Save Energy[www.ase.org] says progress has been made on a number of initiatives that have bipartisan support.

The ASE article, “Policy Outlook 2012: Bipartisan Package Poses Best Prospect for Energy Efficiency,” [http://ase.org/efficiencynews/policy-outlook-2012-bipartisan-package-poses-best-prospect-energy-efficiency] describes seven major policies with bipartisan support: “While several measures that promote energy efficiency are pending, Congress has the best chance of approving a bipartisan package that includes a broad energy efficiency proposal and an appliance standards bill. Such a package could drive consideration of other energy efficiency initiatives.”

Pending bipartisan legislation with the highest relevance to industry includes:

  • Energy Savings & Industrial Competitiveness Act (S. 1000): If enacted, S.1000 would greatly improve energy efficiency in residential and commercial buildings, as well as in industry and manufacturing. Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) and Rob Portman (R-Ohio) introduced S.1000 in May 2011. The Senate Energy Committee reported it in July with strong bipartisan support (18–3 vote); the bill is awaiting consideration in the House.
  • National Implementation of Consensus Appliance Agreement Act (S. 398): If enacted, the bill would strengthen existing appliance standards and create standards for new technology. Senators Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) introduced S. 398 in February 2011. The Senate Energy Committee reported it with strong bipartisan support (18–4 vote).
  • Electric Consumer Right to Know, or e-KNOW, Act (S. 1029): E-KNOW would require utilities to provide customers and other third parties with their energy usage information, including data from smart meters. E-KNOW also would assist energy auditors, demand response aggregators and energy service providers in helping consumers reduce energy use. Senators Mark Udall (D-Colo.) and Scott Brown (R-Mass.) introduced S. 1029 in May 2011; the bill is under consideration in the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
  • Roofing Efficiency Jobs Act (H.R. 2962, S. 1575): This measure would incentivize energy-efficient commercial roof replacements by accelerating depreciation for new roofs with cool roof coatings and good insulation. Introduced in September 2011 by Representatives Tom Reed (R-N.Y.) and Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) in the House, and Senators Ben Cardin (D-Md.) and Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) in the Senate, the bill has been referred to the House Ways and Means and senate Finance Committees for further consideration.

Cooling the Urban Heat Island with more Reflective Roofs

Research says Melbourne could benefit from less black

Can a whiter roof make your home cooler? What about your whole city?

The existing literature and theory suggests that increasing the albedo – or reflectiveness – of a building will reflect incoming sun light and associated heat, reducing the building’s cooling requirements and also reducing the “Urban Heat Island” effect. The City of Melbourne recently commissioned our team to look into whether these claims hold true for Melbourne’s climate.

The urban heat island (UHI) effect refers to the phenomenon whereby a metropolitan or built up area is significantly warmer than its surrounding areas. In some cases, the UHI effect makes average urban daytime air temperatures around 5-6°C higher than the surrounding rural areas in summer.

The urban heat island effect can be detected throughout the year, but it is of particular public policy concern during the summer. This is because higher surface air temperature is associated with air pollution, heat stress-related mortality and illness, and increases in electricity demand for air conditioning. For example, in Melbourne during the heat wave of February 2009 there were 374 “excess deaths” reported.

Many civilizations rely on white roofs to keep cool: will Australia join them?

Increased vegetation, higher albedo surfaces and higher albedo pavements are cited as the main opportunities to reduce this urban heat island effect. During a typical sunny day, there is approximately 1 kW/m² of solar radiation hitting a roof’s surface. Between 20% and 95% of this radiation is absorbed – the difference is based on the different roof colours. This massive heat load affects the microclimate around our cities. The thermal or long wave radiation reradiated from building surfaces affects air temperature, relative humidity and wind speed.

Akbari and Konopacki have calculated the how much energy – used for cooling – would be saved by heat island mitigation strategies. They looked at the application of cool materials and increases in vegetation cover for 240 regions in the United States. They found that for residential buildings, the cooling energy savings vary between 12% and 25%; for office buildings between 5% and 18%; and for commercial (retail stores) buildings between 7% and 17%.

Our Melbourne-based research tested four buildings in a suite of six full-scale buildings of approximately 12m². We also constructed a smaller half-scale building to help us look at things that are hard to test on a real building: what happens when the roof gets dirty; where best to put sensors; and taking thermal images. The building treatments included three different types of paint, a control and a “green roof” (which we’ll be reporting on later). Our results are available in the full report on the City of Melbourne website.

We found that for older buildings (those that do not meet current Building Code of Australia insulation requirements), the high albedo paints will always provide a significant reduction in cooling requirements and increased comfort. Those that benefit the most are industrial buildings such as warehouses, airports, shopping centres, factories and commercial buildings.

Residential buildings don’t benefit as much from white roofs.

Residential buildings show the least benefit. This is because homes need to be heated for a significant part of the year; painting the roof white loses the passive benefit of solar gain on the roof in winter (even if it’s minor). Further, when buildings have cooling systems on the roof, then the roof surface can be up to 40° cooler, leading to an efficiency benefit. That is, the system uses less energy to cool the air and the building requires less cooling because of the decreased solar gain in summer.

We looked at heat transfer, reflected energy off the roofs, internal ambient temperature, roof and ceiling temperatures and background weather data. We took into account variables such as insulation levels, paint tint and colour, roof pitch and overshadowing. All of these showed that there was still a benefit to using the white paint.

The only exception was a residence with R3.5 or greater insulation in the ceiling, because in Melbourne we spend 60% of the time heating and only 5-8% cooling. Under this scenario there was a benefit in summer but a cost in winter (though temperatures of twenty degrees or more can still build up in the roof cavity adding to the UHI).

This leads to the really interesting discussion which underpins this research. How does all this affect the larger context: urban heat islands, community benefits and the overall reduction of cooling energy use (and resulting greenhouse gas emission) across an entire city?

Our research, and that of the authors mentioned above, shows that there is a benefit to using the higher albedo treatments, green roofs and lighter roads and paths. The easiest and cheapest of these is paint. It will reduce cooling energy use, especially peak energy use. It will reduce the UHI and its associated health impacts. And it will lead to increased comfort.

To further enrich these findings we plan to continue our research for the next three years to look at different roofing materials, green roofs and photo-voltaic panel performance. We will also develop an urban microclimate model.

This article was originally published at The Conversation.
Read the original article.

The New Green Roofing: Rooftop Revenue Generation

There might be a virtual treasure trove above your head. Rooftop revenue generation is increasingly becoming a viable concept thanks to advances in technology, government incentives and energy deregulation. In this article, we will cover basic ideas on the way you might be able to create cash flow from your roofing system.

Rooftop revenue generation is not a particularly new concept. Building owners and developers have been capitalizing on the idea for years with cellular antenna installations where cellular companies paid a small lease for rooftop space for their equipment. A rooftop can have antennas mounted on or above its parapet, on top of elevator shafts, and even have small flagpoles or rooftop cell towers mounted on them. They are usually less obtrusive from the ground level and can have less of a visual impact by deployed on an existing structure.

Read more ...

Reflective Roof Rebates

Reflective roof coatings deflect the sun’s rays, lowering the surface temperature of the roof and decreasing the amount of heat transferred into a building. Therefore, energy-efficient roofs reduce the amount of air conditioning used by your building, resulting in lower energy bills for your business, a more comfortable environment for your employees and customers, and an improved environment for your facility’s equipment and furnishings.

CPS Energy is offering a rebate of $0.10 per square foot over conditioned spaces for reflective roof coatings. This rebate is only available for buildings with five stories or less. Review the guidelines and requirements needed to take advantage of this rebate.

This rebate only applies to building improvement or retrofit projects. It is not available for new construction projects.

Guidelines for Reflective Roof Product Rebates

The following guidelines must be met before a CPS Energy rebate can be approved and processed:

1. All rebate applications are subject to the general provisions including a site visit from CPS Energy personnel after completion of the project.

2. CPS Energy will provide rebates for all cool roofs meeting the reflectivity requirements in the program including installations replacing existing cool roof technology.

3. Rated reflectivity, test method of reflectivity and a copy of the receipt are required. The reflectiveness of the coating or the integrated, white, single-ply membrane must be measured by test method ASTM E424-71, ASTM E903-96 or a solar spectrum reflectometer. They also must have a minimum reflectivity of 75%.

4. Rebates are based on the square footage of the area of the roof that covers conditioned spaces only. Conditioned spaces being the interior area of the building that is heated and air conditioned.

 

More About Commercial Energy Efficiency

Austin Energy Power Saver™ Program

COMMERCIAL REBATES OVERVIEW

GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS/GUIDELINES – For New Construction & Retrofit Projects

1. Each participant must be served by Austin Energy (AE) and be metered as a commercial customer (once the permanent meter is installed). Federal, state and county facilities are also eligible to participate, as well as schools.

2. Qualifying businesses must operate a minimum of four (4) consecutive hours daily between 2 p.m. and 8 p.m. weekdays, May 1 through October 31 (with the exception of schools).

3. One Customer Information Request form, pertinent rebate application(s) along with the required documentation for each qualifying building component must be submitted. Rebate applications are available on the web at http://www.austinenergy.com/go/commercialrebates. For new construction projects, rebate applications may be submitted to Austin Energy while the project is under review at the ‘One Stop Shop’ (974.6370). This early involvement in the planning process will give AE personnel the opportunity to provide input into the project.

4. All installations must exceed the IECC Energy Code and all City of Austin amendments. All installations require permits as mandated by the City of Austin’s Development, Review and Inspection Department (974-6406).

5. All installed equipment must be new and must carry a minimum one-year warranty. Also, efficiency improvements resulting from rebate payments must remain in place, operating and maintained, for at least five (5) years from the date that rebate funds are issued to the customer.

6. Certain small business customers and non-profits may be qualified for a bonus on the rebate.

7. A small business is defined as a commercial customer that does not exceed a demand of 100 kilowatts during Austin Energy’s peak months (May 1 – October 31). Bonus rebates to qualified small business customers will be limited to a maximum of five (5) separate electric accounts per fiscal year.

8. If necessary, after receiving and reviewing the application, an AE representative will schedule an initial site visit or pre-inspection to verify the rebate opportunity and estimate the rebate amount.

9. Upon project completion, the customer is to contact AE in order to schedule a final (post-inspection) during which the AE representative will confirm the installation.

10. The customer will receive their rebate 4 to 6 weeks from final program approval.

11. For each energy project, the rebate cannot exceed 50% of the total job costs, including equipment, installation, tax, etc. A final invoice will be required to confirm the total project cost.

12. Rebate funds can be encumbered during the fiscal year in which the funds are to be disbursed. Austin Energy rebates that exceed $55,000 can be issued only after specific City Council approval.

Program guidelines and rebate levels are subject to change at any time, without notice.


Login